Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A750 and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc A750 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by a significant 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the Arc A750 with 8GB VRAM (Xe-HPG architecture), against the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with 4GB VRAM (Turing architecture). The Arc A750 offers significantly better value for money with a 231% higher value score. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is more power-efficient, consuming 100W compared to 225W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the Arc A750
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Xe-HPG | Turing |
| VRAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| TDP | 225W | 100W |
| Current Price | $199 New • Amazon | $249 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
If value for money and price-to-performance ratio are your top priorities, then choose the Arc A750. But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Arc A750. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Arc A750 with 8GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.