Intel logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$199
New
VS
AMD logo

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A750 and Radeon Pro W5700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A750 +48%
28
8GB , 225W
Radeon Pro W5700
19
8GB , 205W

Arc A750 outperforms Radeon Pro W5700 by a significant 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Arc A750 with 8GB VRAM (Xe-HPG architecture), against the Radeon Pro W5700 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 3 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon Pro W5700 is more power-efficient, consuming 205W compared to 225W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Arc A750

48% higher 3DMark score (12,451 versus 8,441)

Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro W5700

9% lower power consumption (205W versus 225W)

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Arc A750
+48%
12,451
Radeon Pro W5700
8,441

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Arc A750 Radeon Pro W5700
Architecture Xe-HPG RDNA 3
VRAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
TDP 225W 205W
Current Price $199
New β€’ Amazon
N/A

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Arc A750. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.