Intel logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$199
New
VS
AMD logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$387
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A750 and Radeon R9 390, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A750 +214%
28
8GB , 225W
Radeon R9 390
9
8GB , 275W

Arc A750 outperforms Radeon R9 390 by a significant 214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Arc A750 with 8GB VRAM (Xe-HPG architecture), against the Radeon R9 390 with 8GB VRAM. The Arc A750 offers significantly better value for money with a 511% higher value score. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient, consuming 225W compared to 275W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Arc A750

511% better value score (63 versus 10)
214% higher 3DMark score (12,451 versus 3,964)
18% lower power consumption (225W versus 275W)
$188 lower current price ($199 versus $387)

Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 390

Value Score Comparison

Price-to-performance value analysis

Arc A750
+511% better value
63
Radeon R9 390
10

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Arc A750
+214%
12,451
Radeon R9 390
3,964

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Arc A750 Radeon R9 390
Architecture Xe-HPG N/A
VRAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
TDP 225W 275W
Current Price $199
New • Amazon
$387
New • Amazon

Conclusion

If value for money and price-to-performance ratio are your top priorities, then choose the Arc A750. But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Arc A750. Budget-conscious buyers will appreciate the Arc A750's lower 199 price point. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.