Intel logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$199
New
VS
AMD logo

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A750 and Radeon Vega Frontier Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A750 +79%
28
8GB , 225W
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
16
16GB , 350W

Arc A750 outperforms Radeon Vega Frontier Edition by a significant 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Arc A750 with 8GB VRAM (Xe-HPG architecture), against the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition with 16GB VRAM (Vega architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient, consuming 225W compared to 350W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Arc A750

79% higher 3DMark score (12,451 versus 6,956)
36% lower power consumption (225W versus 350W)

Reasons to consider the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

100% more VRAM: 16GB versus 8GB

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Arc A750
+79%
12,451
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
6,956

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Arc A750 Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Architecture Xe-HPG Vega
VRAM Size 8 GB 16 GB
TDP 225W 350W
Current Price $199
New • Amazon
N/A

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Arc A750. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Arc A750 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition with 16GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.