Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A770 and Radeon Pro 5700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc A770 outperforms Radeon Pro 5700 by a significant 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the Arc A770 with 16GB VRAM (Xe-HPG architecture), against the Radeon Pro 5700 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 3 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon Pro 5700 is more power-efficient, consuming 130W compared to 225W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the Arc A770
Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro 5700
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | Arc A770 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Xe-HPG | RDNA 3 |
| VRAM Size | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| TDP | 225W | 130W |
| Current Price | $330 New • Amazon | N/A |
Conclusion
But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Arc A770. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon Pro 5700 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Arc A770 with 16GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.