Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A770 and Radeon Pro W5500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc A770 outperforms Radeon Pro W5500 by a significant 182% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the Arc A770 with 16GB VRAM (Xe-HPG architecture), against the Radeon Pro W5500 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA architecture). The Arc A770 offers significantly better value for money with a 30% higher value score. The Radeon Pro W5500 is more power-efficient, consuming 125W compared to 225W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the Arc A770
Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro W5500
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | Arc A770 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Xe-HPG | RDNA |
| VRAM Size | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| TDP | 225W | 125W |
| Current Price | $330 New • Amazon | $152 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Arc A770. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon Pro W5500 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Arc A770 with 16GB VRAM provides more headroom. Budget-conscious buyers will appreciate the Radeon Pro W5500's lower 152 price point. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.