Intel logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$330
New
VS
AMD logo

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A770 and Radeon Pro W5700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A770 +61%
31
16GB , 225W
Radeon Pro W5700
19
8GB , 205W

Arc A770 outperforms Radeon Pro W5700 by a significant 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Arc A770 with 16GB VRAM (Xe-HPG architecture), against the Radeon Pro W5700 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 3 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon Pro W5700 is more power-efficient, consuming 205W compared to 225W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Arc A770

61% higher 3DMark score (13,563 versus 8,441)
100% more VRAM: 16GB versus 8GB

Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro W5700

9% lower power consumption (205W versus 225W)

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Arc A770
+61%
13,563
Radeon Pro W5700
8,441

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Arc A770 Radeon Pro W5700
Architecture Xe-HPG RDNA 3
VRAM Size 16 GB 8 GB
TDP 225W 205W
Current Price $330
New β€’ Amazon
N/A

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Arc A770. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Arc A770 with 16GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.