Intel logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$330
New
VS
AMD logo

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A770 and Radeon R9 295X2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A770 +247%
31
16GB , 225W
Radeon R9 295X2
9
8GB , 500W

Arc A770 outperforms Radeon R9 295X2 by a significant 247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Arc A770 with 16GB VRAM (Xe-HPG architecture), against the Radeon R9 295X2 with 8GB VRAM. Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Arc A770 is more power-efficient, consuming 225W compared to 500W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Arc A770

247% higher 3DMark score (13,563 versus 3,910)
100% more VRAM: 16GB versus 8GB
55% lower power consumption (225W versus 500W)

Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 295X2

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Arc A770
+247%
13,563
Radeon R9 295X2
3,910

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Arc A770 Radeon R9 295X2
Architecture Xe-HPG N/A
VRAM Size 16 GB 8 GB
TDP 225W 500W
Current Price $330
New β€’ Amazon
N/A

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Arc A770. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Arc A770 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Arc A770 with 16GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.