NVIDIA logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$249
New
VS
AMD logo

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon Pro 5700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
11
4GB , 100W
Radeon Pro 5700 +77%
19
8GB , 130W

Radeon Pro 5700 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by a significant 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with 4GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the Radeon Pro 5700 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 3 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is more power-efficient, consuming 100W compared to 130W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

23% lower power consumption (100W versus 130W)

Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro 5700

77% higher 3DMark score (8,330 versus 4,702)
100% more VRAM: 8GB versus 4GB

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4,702
Radeon Pro 5700
+77%
8,330

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Radeon Pro 5700
Architecture Turing RDNA 3
VRAM Size 4 GB 8 GB
TDP 100W 130W
Current Price $249
New • Amazon
N/A

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon Pro 5700. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon Pro 5700 with 8GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.