NVIDIA logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$249
New
VS
AMD logo

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon Pro Duo, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
11
4GB , 100W
Radeon Pro Duo +7%
11
32GB , 350W

Radeon Pro Duo outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by a moderate 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with 4GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the Radeon Pro Duo with 32GB VRAM. Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is more power-efficient, consuming 100W compared to 350W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

71% lower power consumption (100W versus 350W)

Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro Duo

7% higher 3DMark score (5,031 versus 4,702)
700% more VRAM: 32GB versus 4GB

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4,702
Radeon Pro Duo
+7%
5,031

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Radeon Pro Duo
Architecture Turing N/A
VRAM Size 4 GB 32 GB
TDP 100W 350W
Current Price $249
New • Amazon
N/A

Conclusion

For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon Pro Duo with 32GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.