Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 390, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Radeon R9 390 by a significant 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with 4GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the Radeon R9 390 with 8GB VRAM. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers significantly better value for money with a 84% higher value score. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is more power-efficient, consuming 100W compared to 275W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 390
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | N/A |
| VRAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| TDP | 100W | 275W |
| Current Price | $249 New • Amazon | $387 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon R9 390 with 8GB VRAM provides more headroom. Budget-conscious buyers will appreciate the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's lower 249 price point. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.