Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 6400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Radeon RX 6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1650 with 4GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the Radeon RX 6400 with 4GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient, consuming 53W compared to 75W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1650
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6400
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2 |
| VRAM Size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| TDP | 75W | 53W |
| Current Price | $249 New • Amazon | $200 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.