NVIDIA logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$179
New
VS
NVIDIA logo

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and GeForce GTX 780 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +80%
14
6GB , 125W
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
8
3GB , 250W

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER outperforms GeForce GTX 780 Ti by a significant 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER with 6GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the GeForce GTX 780 Ti with 3GB VRAM. Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient, consuming 125W compared to 250W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

80% higher 3DMark score (6,078 versus 3,373)
100% more VRAM: 6GB versus 3GB
50% lower power consumption (125W versus 250W)

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+80%
6,078
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
3,373

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Architecture Turing N/A
VRAM Size 6 GB 3 GB
TDP 125W 250W
Current Price $179
New • Amazon
N/A

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER with 6GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.