Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce RTX 3050, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1660 with 6GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the GeForce RTX 3050 with 8GB VRAM (Ampere architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient, consuming 120W compared to 130W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1660
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| VRAM Size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| TDP | 120W | 130W |
| Current Price | $199 New • Amazon | $199 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the GeForce RTX 3050. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the GeForce RTX 3050 with 8GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.