Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 and Radeon R9 290X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon R9 290X by a significant 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1660 with 6GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the Radeon R9 290X with 4GB VRAM. The GeForce GTX 1660 offers significantly better value for money with a 44% higher value score. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient, consuming 120W compared to 290W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1660
Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 290X
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | N/A |
| VRAM Size | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| TDP | 120W | 290W |
| Current Price | $199 New • Amazon | $210 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the GeForce GTX 1660. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1660 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the GeForce GTX 1660 with 6GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.