Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 and Radeon R9 390, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon R9 390 by a significant 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1660 with 6GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the Radeon R9 390 with 8GB VRAM. The GeForce GTX 1660 offers significantly better value for money with a 168% higher value score. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient, consuming 120W compared to 275W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1660
Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 390
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | N/A |
| VRAM Size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| TDP | 120W | 275W |
| Current Price | $199 New • Amazon | $387 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
If value for money and price-to-performance ratio are your top priorities, then choose the GeForce GTX 1660. But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the GeForce GTX 1660. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1660 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon R9 390 with 8GB VRAM provides more headroom. Budget-conscious buyers will appreciate the GeForce GTX 1660's lower 199 price point. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.