NVIDIA logo
VS
AMD logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$699
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 64, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
8
3GB , 250W
Radeon RX Vega 64 +118%
17
8GB , 295W

Radeon RX Vega 64 outperforms GeForce GTX 780 Ti by a significant 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 780 Ti with 3GB VRAM, against the Radeon RX Vega 64 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is more power-efficient, consuming 250W compared to 295W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 780 Ti

15% lower power consumption (250W versus 295W)

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX Vega 64

118% higher 3DMark score (7,367 versus 3,373)
167% more VRAM: 8GB versus 3GB

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
3,373
Radeon RX Vega 64
+118%
7,367

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification GeForce GTX 780 Ti Radeon RX Vega 64
Architecture N/A RDNA 2
VRAM Size 3 GB 8 GB
TDP 250W 295W
Current Price N/A $699
New • Amazon

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon RX Vega 64. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon RX Vega 64 with 8GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.