NVIDIA logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$735
New
VS
AMD logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$699
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 and Radeon RX Vega 64, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce RTX 2080 +51%
25
8GB , 250W
Radeon RX Vega 64
17
8GB , 295W

GeForce RTX 2080 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 64 by a significant 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce RTX 2080 with 8GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the Radeon RX Vega 64 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The GeForce RTX 2080 is more power-efficient, consuming 250W compared to 295W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 2080

43% better value score (15 versus 11)
51% higher 3DMark score (11,093 versus 7,367)
15% lower power consumption (250W versus 295W)
DLSS support with broader game compatibility and better performance scaling

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX Vega 64

$36 lower current price ($699 versus $735)

Value Score Comparison

Price-to-performance value analysis

GeForce RTX 2080
+43% better value
15
Radeon RX Vega 64
11

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

GeForce RTX 2080
+51%
11,093
Radeon RX Vega 64
7,367

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification GeForce RTX 2080 Radeon RX Vega 64
Architecture Turing RDNA 2
VRAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
TDP 250W 295W
Current Price $735
New • Amazon
$699
New • Amazon

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the GeForce RTX 2080. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.