Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 and GeForce RTX 4090, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 by a significant 480% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce RTX 3050 with 8GB VRAM (Ampere architecture), against the GeForce RTX 4090 with 24GB VRAM (Ada Lovelace architecture). The GeForce RTX 3050 offers significantly better value for money with a 173% higher value score. The GeForce RTX 3050 is more power-efficient, consuming 130W compared to 450W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4090
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
Specification | GeForce RTX 3050 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
VRAM Size | 8 GB | 24 GB |
TDP | 130W | 450W |
Current Price | $199 New • Amazon | $3145 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
If value for money and price-to-performance ratio are your top priorities, then choose the GeForce RTX 3050. But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the GeForce RTX 4090. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce RTX 3050 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the GeForce RTX 4090 with 24GB VRAM provides more headroom. Budget-conscious buyers will appreciate the GeForce RTX 3050's lower 199 price point. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.