NVIDIA logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$199
New
VS
AMD logo

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 and Radeon Pro W5700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce RTX 3050
14
8GB , 130W
Radeon Pro W5700 +36%
19
8GB , 205W

Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 by a significant 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce RTX 3050 with 8GB VRAM (Ampere architecture), against the Radeon Pro W5700 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 3 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The GeForce RTX 3050 is more power-efficient, consuming 130W compared to 205W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050

37% lower power consumption (130W versus 205W)
DLSS support with broader game compatibility and better performance scaling

Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro W5700

36% higher 3DMark score (8,441 versus 6,205)

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

GeForce RTX 3050
6,205
Radeon Pro W5700
+36%
8,441

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification GeForce RTX 3050 Radeon Pro W5700
Architecture Ampere RDNA 3
VRAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
TDP 130W 205W
Current Price $199
New β€’ Amazon
N/A

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon Pro W5700. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce RTX 3050 is the better choice. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.