Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 and Radeon R9 390, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms Radeon R9 390 by a significant 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce RTX 3050 with 8GB VRAM (Ampere architecture), against the Radeon R9 390 with 8GB VRAM. The GeForce RTX 3050 offers significantly better value for money with a 204% higher value score. The GeForce RTX 3050 is more power-efficient, consuming 130W compared to 275W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050
Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 390
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | GeForce RTX 3050 | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Ampere | N/A |
| VRAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| TDP | 130W | 275W |
| Current Price | $199 New • Amazon | $387 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
If value for money and price-to-performance ratio are your top priorities, then choose the GeForce RTX 3050. But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the GeForce RTX 3050. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce RTX 3050 is the better choice. Budget-conscious buyers will appreciate the GeForce RTX 3050's lower 199 price point. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.