NVIDIA logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$199
New
VS
AMD logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$209
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 and Radeon RX 6600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce RTX 3050
14
8GB , 130W
Radeon RX 6600 +31%
19
8GB , 132W

Radeon RX 6600 outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 by a significant 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce RTX 3050 with 8GB VRAM (Ampere architecture), against the Radeon RX 6600 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). The Radeon RX 6600 offers significantly better value for money with a 25% higher value score. The GeForce RTX 3050 is more power-efficient, consuming 130W compared to 132W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050

2% lower power consumption (130W versus 132W)
$10 lower current price ($199 versus $209)
DLSS support with broader game compatibility and better performance scaling

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6600

25% better value score (39 versus 31)
31% higher 3DMark score (8,158 versus 6,205)

Value Score Comparison

Price-to-performance value analysis

GeForce RTX 3050
31
Radeon RX 6600
+25% better value
39

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

GeForce RTX 3050
6,205
Radeon RX 6600
+31%
8,158

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification GeForce RTX 3050 Radeon RX 6600
Architecture Ampere RDNA 2
VRAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
TDP 130W 132W
Current Price $199
New • Amazon
$209
New • Amazon

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon RX 6600. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.