Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 and Radeon RX 6600 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 by a significant 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce RTX 3050 with 8GB VRAM (Ampere architecture), against the Radeon RX 6600 XT with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). The GeForce RTX 3050 offers significantly better value for money with a 28% higher value score. The GeForce RTX 3050 is more power-efficient, consuming 130W compared to 160W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6600 XT
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | GeForce RTX 3050 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2 |
| VRAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| TDP | 130W | 160W |
| Current Price | $199 New • Amazon | $398 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon RX 6600 XT. Budget-conscious buyers will appreciate the GeForce RTX 3050's lower 199 price point. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.