NVIDIA logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$199
New
VS
AMD logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$299
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 and Radeon RX 6650 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce RTX 3050
14
8GB , 130W
Radeon RX 6650 XT +62%
23
8GB , 176W

Radeon RX 6650 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 by a significant 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce RTX 3050 with 8GB VRAM (Ampere architecture), against the Radeon RX 6650 XT with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The GeForce RTX 3050 is more power-efficient, consuming 130W compared to 176W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050

26% lower power consumption (130W versus 176W)
$100 lower current price ($199 versus $299)
DLSS support with broader game compatibility and better performance scaling

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6650 XT

8% better value score (34 versus 31)
62% higher 3DMark score (10,027 versus 6,205)

Value Score Comparison

Price-to-performance value analysis

GeForce RTX 3050
31
Radeon RX 6650 XT
+8% better value
34

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

GeForce RTX 3050
6,205
Radeon RX 6650 XT
+62%
10,027

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification GeForce RTX 3050 Radeon RX 6650 XT
Architecture Ampere RDNA 2
VRAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
TDP 130W 176W
Current Price $199
New • Amazon
$299
New • Amazon

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon RX 6650 XT. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.