AMD logo
VS
AMD logo

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5700 and Radeon R9 295X2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon Pro 5700 +113%
19
8GB , 130W
Radeon R9 295X2
9
8GB , 500W

Radeon Pro 5700 outperforms Radeon R9 295X2 by a significant 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon Pro 5700 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 3 architecture), against the Radeon R9 295X2 with 8GB VRAM. Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon Pro 5700 is more power-efficient, consuming 130W compared to 500W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro 5700

113% higher 3DMark score (8,330 versus 3,910)
74% lower power consumption (130W versus 500W)

Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 295X2

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Radeon Pro 5700
+113%
8,330
Radeon R9 295X2
3,910

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Radeon Pro 5700 Radeon R9 295X2
Architecture RDNA 3 N/A
VRAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
TDP 130W 500W

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon Pro 5700. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon Pro 5700 is the better choice. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.