AMD logo
VS
AMD logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$729
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5700 and Radeon RX 6900 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon Pro W5700
19
8GB , 205W
Radeon RX 6900 XT +144%
47
16GB , 300W

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms Radeon Pro W5700 by a significant 144% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon Pro W5700 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 3 architecture), against the Radeon RX 6900 XT with 16GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon Pro W5700 is more power-efficient, consuming 205W compared to 300W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro W5700

32% lower power consumption (205W versus 300W)

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6900 XT

144% higher 3DMark score (20,621 versus 8,441)
100% more VRAM: 16GB versus 8GB

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Radeon Pro W5700
8,441
Radeon RX 6900 XT
+144%
20,621

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Radeon Pro W5700 Radeon RX 6900 XT
Architecture RDNA 3 RDNA 2
VRAM Size 8 GB 16 GB
TDP 205W 300W
Current Price N/A $729
New • Amazon

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon RX 6900 XT. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon Pro W5700 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon RX 6900 XT with 16GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.