Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R9 290X and Radeon RX 6400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Radeon R9 290X outperforms Radeon RX 6400 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon R9 290X with 4GB VRAM, against the Radeon RX 6400 with 4GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient, consuming 53W compared to 290W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 290X
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6400
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | Radeon R9 290X | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | N/A | RDNA 2 |
| VRAM Size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| TDP | 290W | 53W |
| Current Price | $210 New • Amazon | $200 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon RX 6400 is the better choice. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.