Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R9 290X and Radeon RX 6600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Radeon RX 6600 outperforms Radeon R9 290X by a significant 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon R9 290X with 4GB VRAM, against the Radeon RX 6600 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). The Radeon RX 6600 offers significantly better value for money with a 105% higher value score. The Radeon RX 6600 is more power-efficient, consuming 132W compared to 290W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 290X
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6600
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | Radeon R9 290X | Radeon RX 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | N/A | RDNA 2 |
| VRAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| TDP | 290W | 132W |
| Current Price | $210 New • Amazon | $209 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
If value for money and price-to-performance ratio are your top priorities, then choose the Radeon RX 6600. But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon RX 6600. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon RX 6600 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon RX 6600 with 8GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.