AMD logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$210
New
VS
AMD logo

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 290X and Radeon Vega Frontier Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon R9 290X
9
4GB , 290W
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition +74%
16
16GB , 350W

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition outperforms Radeon R9 290X by a significant 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon R9 290X with 4GB VRAM, against the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition with 16GB VRAM (Vega architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon R9 290X is more power-efficient, consuming 290W compared to 350W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 290X

17% lower power consumption (290W versus 350W)

Reasons to consider the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

74% higher 3DMark score (6,956 versus 3,991)
300% more VRAM: 16GB versus 4GB

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Radeon R9 290X
3,991
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
+74%
6,956

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Radeon R9 290X Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Architecture N/A Vega
VRAM Size 4 GB 16 GB
TDP 290W 350W
Current Price $210
New • Amazon
N/A

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon R9 290X is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition with 16GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.