Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R9 295X2 and Radeon RX 6500 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms Radeon R9 295X2 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon R9 295X2 with 8GB VRAM, against the Radeon RX 6500 XT with 4GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is more power-efficient, consuming 107W compared to 500W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 295X2
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6500 XT
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | N/A | RDNA 2 |
| VRAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| TDP | 500W | 107W |
| Current Price | N/A | $148 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon RX 6500 XT. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon RX 6500 XT is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon R9 295X2 with 8GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.