AMD logo
VS
AMD logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$209
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 295X2 and Radeon RX 6600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon R9 295X2
9
8GB , 500W
Radeon RX 6600 +109%
19
8GB , 132W

Radeon RX 6600 outperforms Radeon R9 295X2 by a significant 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon R9 295X2 with 8GB VRAM, against the Radeon RX 6600 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon RX 6600 is more power-efficient, consuming 132W compared to 500W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 295X2

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6600

109% higher 3DMark score (8,158 versus 3,910)
74% lower power consumption (132W versus 500W)

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Radeon R9 295X2
3,910
Radeon RX 6600
+109%
8,158

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Radeon R9 295X2 Radeon RX 6600
Architecture N/A RDNA 2
VRAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
TDP 500W 132W
Current Price N/A $209
New β€’ Amazon

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon RX 6600. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon RX 6600 is the better choice. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.