AMD logo
VS
AMD logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$398
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 295X2 and Radeon RX 6600 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon R9 295X2
9
8GB , 500W
Radeon RX 6600 XT +148%
22
8GB , 160W

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Radeon R9 295X2 by a significant 148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon R9 295X2 with 8GB VRAM, against the Radeon RX 6600 XT with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon RX 6600 XT is more power-efficient, consuming 160W compared to 500W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 295X2

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6600 XT

148% higher 3DMark score (9,707 versus 3,910)
68% lower power consumption (160W versus 500W)

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Radeon R9 295X2
3,910
Radeon RX 6600 XT
+148%
9,707

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Radeon R9 295X2 Radeon RX 6600 XT
Architecture N/A RDNA 2
VRAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
TDP 500W 160W
Current Price N/A $398
New • Amazon

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon RX 6600 XT. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon RX 6600 XT is the better choice. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.