AMD logo
VS
AMD logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$795
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 295X2 and Radeon RX 6700 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon R9 295X2
9
8GB , 500W
Radeon RX 6700 XT +228%
29
12GB , 230W

Radeon RX 6700 XT outperforms Radeon R9 295X2 by a significant 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon R9 295X2 with 8GB VRAM, against the Radeon RX 6700 XT with 12GB VRAM (RDNA 3 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon RX 6700 XT is more power-efficient, consuming 230W compared to 500W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 295X2

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6700 XT

228% higher 3DMark score (12,808 versus 3,910)
50% more VRAM: 12GB versus 8GB
54% lower power consumption (230W versus 500W)

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Radeon R9 295X2
3,910
Radeon RX 6700 XT
+228%
12,808

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Radeon R9 295X2 Radeon RX 6700 XT
Architecture N/A RDNA 3
VRAM Size 8 GB 12 GB
TDP 500W 230W
Current Price N/A $795
New • Amazon

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon RX 6700 XT. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon RX 6700 XT is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon RX 6700 XT with 12GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.