AMD logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$57
New
VS
AMD logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$209
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 480 and Radeon RX 6600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon RX 480
9
8GB , 150W
Radeon RX 6600 +97%
19
8GB , 132W

Radeon RX 6600 outperforms Radeon RX 480 by a significant 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon RX 480 with 8GB VRAM, against the Radeon RX 6600 with 8GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). The Radeon RX 480 offers significantly better value for money with a 86% higher value score. The Radeon RX 6600 is more power-efficient, consuming 132W compared to 150W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 480

86% better value score (73 versus 39)
$152 lower current price ($57 versus $209)

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6600

97% higher 3DMark score (8,158 versus 4,135)
12% lower power consumption (132W versus 150W)

Value Score Comparison

Price-to-performance value analysis

Radeon RX 480
+86% better value
73
Radeon RX 6600
39

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Radeon RX 480
4,135
Radeon RX 6600
+97%
8,158

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Radeon RX 480 Radeon RX 6600
Architecture N/A RDNA 2
VRAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
TDP 150W 132W
Current Price $57
New • Amazon
$209
New • Amazon

Conclusion

If value for money and price-to-performance ratio are your top priorities, then choose the Radeon RX 480. But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon RX 6600. Budget-conscious buyers will appreciate the Radeon RX 480's lower 57 price point. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.