Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 6400 and Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB outperforms Radeon RX 6400 by a significant 354% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon RX 6400 with 4GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture), against the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB with 16GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB offers significantly better value for money with a 148% higher value score. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient, consuming 53W compared to 160W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6400
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | Radeon RX 6400 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | RDNA 2 |
| VRAM Size | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| TDP | 53W | 160W |
| Current Price | $200 New • Amazon | $366 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
If value for money and price-to-performance ratio are your top priorities, then choose the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB. But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon RX 6400 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB with 16GB VRAM provides more headroom. Budget-conscious buyers will appreciate the Radeon RX 6400's lower 200 price point. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.