AMD logo
Buy on Newegg logo
$599
New
VS
AMD logo
Buy on Newegg logo
$649
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 9070 and Radeon RX 9070 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon RX 9070
61
16GB , 220W
Radeon RX 9070 XT +12%
68
16GB , 304W

Radeon RX 9070 XT outperforms Radeon RX 9070 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon RX 9070 with 16GB VRAM (RDNA 3 architecture), against the Radeon RX 9070 XT with 16GB VRAM (RDNA 3 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon RX 9070 is more power-efficient, consuming 220W compared to 304W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 9070

28% lower power consumption (220W versus 304W)
$50 lower current price ($599 versus $649)

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 9070 XT

3% better value score (46 versus 45)
12% higher 3DMark score (29,992 versus 26,856)

Value Score Comparison

Price-to-performance value analysis

Radeon RX 9070
45
Radeon RX 9070 XT
+3% better value
46

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Radeon RX 9070
26,856
Radeon RX 9070 XT
+12%
29,992

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT
Architecture RDNA 3 RDNA 3
VRAM Size 16 GB 16 GB
TDP 220W 304W
Current Price $599
New • Newegg
$649
New • Newegg

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon RX 9070 XT. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon RX 9070 is the better choice. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.