Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A580 and GeForce GTX 1650, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc A580 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by a significant 206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the Arc A580 with 8GB VRAM (Xe-HPG architecture), against the GeForce GTX 1650 with 4GB VRAM (Turing architecture). The Arc A580 offers significantly better value for money with a 194% higher value score. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient, consuming 75W compared to 175W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the Arc A580
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1650
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | Arc A580 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Xe-HPG | Turing |
| VRAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| TDP | 175W | 75W |
| Current Price | $259 New • Amazon | $249 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
If value for money and price-to-performance ratio are your top priorities, then choose the Arc A580. But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Arc A580. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1650 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Arc A580 with 8GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.