Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce RTX 3050, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by a significant 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1650 with 4GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the GeForce RTX 3050 with 8GB VRAM (Ampere architecture). The GeForce RTX 3050 offers significantly better value for money with a 119% higher value score. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient, consuming 75W compared to 130W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1650
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 3050 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| VRAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| TDP | 75W | 130W |
| Current Price | $249 New • Amazon | $199 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
If value for money and price-to-performance ratio are your top priorities, then choose the GeForce RTX 3050. But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the GeForce RTX 3050. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1650 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the GeForce RTX 3050 with 8GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.