Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon R9 380X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R9 380X by a significant 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1650 with 4GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the Radeon R9 380X with 4GB VRAM. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers significantly better value for money with a 112% higher value score. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient, consuming 75W compared to 190W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1650
Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 380X
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | N/A |
| VRAM Size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| TDP | 75W | 190W |
| Current Price | $249 New • Amazon | $446 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the GeForce GTX 1650. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1650 is the better choice. Budget-conscious buyers will appreciate the GeForce GTX 1650's lower 249 price point. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.