NVIDIA logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$179
New
VS
AMD logo

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and Radeon Pro WX 9100, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
14
6GB , 125W
Radeon Pro WX 9100 +5%
15
16GB , 230W

Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER by a moderate 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER with 6GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the Radeon Pro WX 9100 with 16GB VRAM. Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient, consuming 125W compared to 230W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

46% lower power consumption (125W versus 230W)

Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro WX 9100

5% higher 3DMark score (6,393 versus 6,078)
167% more VRAM: 16GB versus 6GB

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
6,078
Radeon Pro WX 9100
+5%
6,393

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Radeon Pro WX 9100
Architecture Turing N/A
VRAM Size 6 GB 16 GB
TDP 125W 230W
Current Price $179
New • Amazon
N/A

Conclusion

For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon Pro WX 9100 with 16GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.