AMD logo
VS
NVIDIA logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$199
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 9100 and GeForce RTX 3050, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon Pro WX 9100 +3%
15
16GB , 230W
GeForce RTX 3050
14
8GB , 130W

Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon Pro WX 9100 with 16GB VRAM, against the GeForce RTX 3050 with 8GB VRAM (Ampere architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The GeForce RTX 3050 is more power-efficient, consuming 130W compared to 230W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro WX 9100

3% higher 3DMark score (6,393 versus 6,205)
100% more VRAM: 16GB versus 8GB

Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050

43% lower power consumption (130W versus 230W)
DLSS support with broader game compatibility and better performance scaling

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Radeon Pro WX 9100
+3%
6,393
GeForce RTX 3050
6,205

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Radeon Pro WX 9100 GeForce RTX 3050
Architecture N/A Ampere
VRAM Size 16 GB 8 GB
TDP 230W 130W
Current Price N/A $199
New • Amazon

Conclusion

For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce RTX 3050 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon Pro WX 9100 with 16GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.