NVIDIA logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$256
New
VS
AMD logo

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 9100, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
15
6GB , 120W
Radeon Pro WX 9100 +0%
15
16GB , 230W

Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti by a minimal 0% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with 6GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the Radeon Pro WX 9100 with 16GB VRAM. Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient, consuming 120W compared to 230W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

48% lower power consumption (120W versus 230W)

Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro WX 9100

0% higher 3DMark score (6,393 versus 6,373)
167% more VRAM: 16GB versus 6GB

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
6,373
Radeon Pro WX 9100
6,393

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Radeon Pro WX 9100
Architecture Turing N/A
VRAM Size 6 GB 16 GB
TDP 120W 230W
Current Price $256
New • Amazon
N/A

Conclusion

For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon Pro WX 9100 with 16GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.