NVIDIA logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$256
New
VS
AMD logo

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon R9 295X2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti +63%
15
6GB , 120W
Radeon R9 295X2
9
8GB , 500W

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 295X2 by a significant 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with 6GB VRAM (Turing architecture), against the Radeon R9 295X2 with 8GB VRAM. Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient, consuming 120W compared to 500W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

63% higher 3DMark score (6,373 versus 3,910)
76% lower power consumption (120W versus 500W)

Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 295X2

33% more VRAM: 8GB versus 6GB

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+63%
6,373
Radeon R9 295X2
3,910

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Radeon R9 295X2
Architecture Turing N/A
VRAM Size 6 GB 8 GB
TDP 120W 500W
Current Price $256
New • Amazon
N/A

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon R9 295X2 with 8GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.