AMD logo
VS
NVIDIA logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$179
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 9100 and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon Pro WX 9100 +5%
15
16GB , 230W
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
14
6GB , 125W

Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER by a moderate 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon Pro WX 9100 with 16GB VRAM, against the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER with 6GB VRAM (Turing architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient, consuming 125W compared to 230W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro WX 9100

5% higher 3DMark score (6,393 versus 6,078)
167% more VRAM: 16GB versus 6GB

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

46% lower power consumption (125W versus 230W)

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Radeon Pro WX 9100
+5%
6,393
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
6,078

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Radeon Pro WX 9100 GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Architecture N/A Turing
VRAM Size 16 GB 6 GB
TDP 230W 125W
Current Price N/A $179
New • Amazon

Conclusion

For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon Pro WX 9100 with 16GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.