AMD logo
VS
AMD logo
Buy on Amazon logo
$200
New

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 9100 and Radeon RX 6400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon Pro WX 9100 +77%
15
16GB , 230W
Radeon RX 6400
8
4GB , 53W

Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms Radeon RX 6400 by a significant 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Summary

We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon Pro WX 9100 with 16GB VRAM, against the Radeon RX 6400 with 4GB VRAM (RDNA 2 architecture). Both graphics cards offer competitive value for their respective price points. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient, consuming 53W compared to 230W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.

Key Differences

An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card

Reasons to consider the Radeon Pro WX 9100

77% higher 3DMark score (6,393 versus 3,622)
300% more VRAM: 16GB versus 4GB

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6400

77% lower power consumption (53W versus 230W)

Benchmarks

Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks

3DMark synthetic

Radeon Pro WX 9100
+77%
6,393
Radeon RX 6400
3,622

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side hardware comparison

Specification Radeon Pro WX 9100 Radeon RX 6400
Architecture N/A RDNA 2
VRAM Size 16 GB 4 GB
TDP 230W 53W
Current Price N/A $200
New • Amazon

Conclusion

But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the Radeon Pro WX 9100. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the Radeon RX 6400 is the better choice. If you plan to game at higher resolutions or use VRAM-intensive applications, the Radeon Pro WX 9100 with 16GB VRAM provides more headroom. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.