Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R9 380X and GeForce GTX 1650, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R9 380X by a significant 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Summary
We compared two graphics cards: the Radeon R9 380X with 4GB VRAM, against the GeForce GTX 1650 with 4GB VRAM (Turing architecture). The GeForce GTX 1650 offers significantly better value for money with a 112% higher value score. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient, consuming 75W compared to 190W. On this page, you will find detailed benchmark comparisons, technical specifications, value score analysis, and key differences to help you choose the right graphics card for your needs and budget.
Key Differences
An overview of the main advantages of each graphics card
Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 380X
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1650
Value Score Comparison
Price-to-performance value analysis
Benchmarks
Performance comparison across 1 common benchmarks
3DMark synthetic
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side hardware comparison
| Specification | Radeon R9 380X | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | N/A | Turing |
| VRAM Size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| TDP | 190W | 75W |
| Current Price | $446 New • Amazon | $249 New • Amazon |
Conclusion
But if raw gaming performance and future-proofing are more important – go for the GeForce GTX 1650. For energy efficiency and lower power consumption, the GeForce GTX 1650 is the better choice. Budget-conscious buyers will appreciate the GeForce GTX 1650's lower 249 price point. Both graphics cards have their strengths, so choose based on your specific gaming needs, budget constraints, and performance requirements.